US Supreme Court Decided American Citizens Cannot File A Lawsuit If Their Non-Citizen Spouse Is Denied A Visa To Enter The US Without Explanation

US Supreme Court Decided American Citizens Cannot File A Lawsuit If Their Non-Citizen Spouse Is Denied A Visa To Enter The US Without Explanation

On Friday, the Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision along ideological lines against a California woman who claimed her rights were infringed when federal officials denied her husband entry into the country, citing interpretations of his tattoos.

The ruling concluded that citizens do not inherently possess the right to be involved in federal government determinations regarding the lawful residency of immigrant spouses in the United States.

“While Congress has made it easier for spouses to immigrate, it has never made spousal immigration a matter of right,” said Justice Amy Coney Barrett, reading from the bench the majority opinion joined by her fellow conservatives.

Justice Barrett emphasized that while citizens have a fundamental right to marriage, it is erroneous to infer from this right a broader entitlement that could restrict Congress’s authority to determine the admission or exclusion of foreigners into the United States.

In a dissent joined by her liberal colleagues, Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that denying citizens the ability to seek specific reasons for the denial of entry to their spouses “significantly diminishes the importance of the right to marriage within the immigration context.”

The majority ruled against Los Angeles civil rights attorney Sandra Muñoz, who has been separated from her Salvadoran husband for nearly a decade. The couple initiated the process of obtaining an immigrant visa after their marriage in 2010. Luis Asencio-Cordero, who had been residing in the US without legal status, traveled to the consulate in San Salvador to complete the visa process.

However, his application was denied by a consular officer who cited a law barring entry to individuals who might engage in unlawful activities. The State Department declined to provide a more specific explanation, but through a lawsuit, Muñoz discovered that the denial was partly based on the consular officer’s belief that Asencio-Cordero’s tattoos indicated affiliation with the MS-13 gang.

Asencio-Cordero has denied any association with gangs and has no criminal record. His tattoos, which include symbols like Our Lady of Guadalupe, theatrical masks, and a portrait of psychologist Sigmund Freud, were described by his lawyers as expressions of his intellectual interests and Catholic faith.

The US Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit sided with Muñoz, ordering the State Department to disclose the reason for denial and reconsider the visa application. However, this decision was overturned by the Supreme Court following an appeal by the State Department.

Previous articleVideo: Veteran Actor Kanayo O. Kanayo Criticizes Teenage Actress Angel Unigwe And Her Mother, Threatening To Disrupt Any Film Set Where Angel Is Working
Next articleMan Who Lived Abroad For 40 Years Allegedly Loses His House To The Ghanaian Wife He Brought Over In Under 5 Years
Mr Priceless
A young person with a passion for success and excellence to develop a professional career that encourages empowerment in the overall development of a person which is achieved through hard work. A Journalist with facts and a difference; standing by the truth all the time with interests in Science & Technology, Health, Celebrities' Lifestyle, Crimes, Education and Career Improvement.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here